Summary

• Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
• Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
  • XWiki.XWikiComments[2]

Details

Page properties

Content

...	...	@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
1	1	The [[License Review>>url:http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-review_lists.opensource.org]] mailing list [[is considering>>url:http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/2018-June/003384.html]] using a project management tool for public tracking of the license review process. This page is for collecting information related to this tool selection. Note that the **license-review** list, and corresponding license review process in general, is distinct from the **license-discuss** mailing list, which this document does not address.
2	2
3		-The License Committee recommends hiring a person to aid in the identification and implementation of a better workflow for the review of licenses. We have decided that the current email-based system (Mailman) is inadequate as it is exceedingly difficult to follow discussions, which reduces participation. The tasks that this person will undertake are:
	3	+The License Committee recommends contracting for services in the identification and implementation of a better workflow for the review of licenses. We have decided that the current email-based system (Mailman) is inadequate as it is exceedingly difficult to follow discussions, which reduces participation. The tasks that this person will undertake are:
4	4
5	5	Stage 1:
6	6
7		-* Identify an appropriate license-review vehicle(s) with the attributes below
	7	+* Identify and engage stakeholders to describe business, user, non/functional, and implementation requirements for an appropriate license-review vehicle(s) (including attributes below).
8	8
9	9	(((
10	10	Stage 2:

XWiki.XWikiComments[2]

Author

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-XWiki.pmasson

Comment

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Do we want to require any activities as part of the identification process, e.g. interview current users or the Lic. Comm. or review current License Review Process or workflows? Just thinking such activities would add to the bid. But maybe we're deferring to the process of the winning bidder for business process analysis.

Date

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2020-04-30 17:37:03.0

Selection

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Identify

State

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-SAFE

Target

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-LicenseReviewToolRequirements.WebHome