Last modified by FabioBalli on 2020/03/02 23:12
From version 12.5
edited by FabioBalli
on 2020/02/27 21:38
Change comment: Edited comment 1
To version 12.3
edited by FabioBalli
on 2020/02/27 21:32
Change comment: Added comment

Summary

Details

XWiki.XWikiComments[1]
Comment
... ... @@ -2,10 +2,15 @@
2 2  Thank you for your interest.
3 3  
4 4  1. The board launched online conversations to develop a feeling of belonging among members. I would go in the same direction, doing a short survey to invite all members to share what open-source brings to the world, and to speak about their successes and challenges in adopting open-source. I did that for an association a few months ago (https://asat-sr.ch/meta78-at-apport-monde/), and I find it is a good way to get to know each other, align with the different perceptions, and have a common text that everyone can refer to. :)
5 -1. I think that should be discussed within the OSI board. I contacted some board members to better understand their activities. I feel the most important is to agree on a way of cooperating where every board member can value their skills for the common benefit.
6 -1. For me, both are needed. A team profile of the board could enable its members to know their complementarities, and who likes to do what. My strength is more in implementing disruptive changes.
7 -1. What would you suggest? :) I would advocate for a strategy that is collectively defined by the board, or by all members.
8 -1. OSI can help achieve societal challenges, if we develop open collaboration between members and beyond (libre and open-source software, open hardware, open knowledge, participatory research, social economy, etc).
9 -1. I find this should be discussed by the board, or by all members. Maintaining a constructive dialogue with other organizations is essential, even if we have different mindsets and values.
10 10  
6 +2. I think that should be discussed within the OSI board. I contacted some board members to better understand their activities. I feel the most important is to agree on a way of cooperating where every board member can value their skills for the common benefit.
7 +
8 +3. For me, both are needed. A team profile of the board could enable its members to know their complementarities, and who likes to do what. My strength is more in implementing disruptive changes.
9 +
10 +4. What would you suggest? :) I would advocate for a strategy that is collectively defined by the board, or by all members.
11 +
12 +5. OSI can help achieve societal challenges, if we develop open collaboration between members and beyond (libre and open-source software, open hardware, open knowledge, participatory research, social economy, etc).
13 +
14 +6. I find this should be discussed by the board, or by all members. I find keeping a constructive dialogue with other organizations is essential, even if we have different mindsets and values.
15 +
11 11  Best,
Date
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -2020-02-27 21:32:07.0
1 +2020-02-27 21:32:07.173