Changes for page Coraline Ada Ehmke
Last modified by XWikiGuest on 2020/05/28 19:28
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
-
Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -XWiki. XWikiGuest1 +XWiki.pmasson
- XWiki.XWikiComments[7]
-
- Date
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2020-02-19 12:15:12. 7241 +2020-02-19 12:15:12.0
- XWiki.XWikiComments[8]
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Anonymous - Comment
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,7 @@ 1 +I fully support this candidate. We developers write code that can literally kill people either directly or indirectly, so I don't think it's unreasonable with a license like the Hippocratic license that draws a line at human rights abuse. How can one argue otherwise? 2 + 3 +Open source software has a big problem and that's representation. We are disproportionally white, male developers writing software for a multi-faceted, diverse world. I would argue that tools like the Contributor Covenant and the Hippocratic license are necessary steps to owning up to our real ethical responsibility towards our users and each other. 4 + 5 +The software we write is political because it has such a big effect on society. We're not above politics or above the law of human rights. I read the Hippocratic license and I think it makes a lot of sense. If I decide to write free software in my spare time you bet I'll want to limit its use so that it can only be used by ethical actors. 6 + 7 +So, yeah. I think this is a great candidate that would help improve the world of open source. - Date
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2020-02-19 19:08:39.0