OSI-EDU-WG-notes-25feb2014
Participating
Joseph Potvin
Patrick Masson
Wayne Mackintosh
Discussion Notes
1: Text of Short Announcement & Invitation to Participate
- Please add your suggested text to this box:
Call for Participation in OSI's Working Group on Management Education: Let's work together to strengthen the quality of management amongst free/libre/open projects and portfolios, and amongst their governing organizations.
We invite your collaboration towards improving the FLOW Syllabus. This is a peer-curated guide to the domains of knowledge that anyone involved in creating or maintaining Free/Libre/Open Works (FLOW). It is designed to help stakeholders to optimize value, to control costs, and to manage risk.
Points discussed:
- The announcement/invitation should be promotional and perhaps even somewhat provocative
- OSI has several conferences coming soon, and this can be highlighted
- Useful to have a twitter link, wiki link, presentation link
- Touch on different perspectives of Syllabus use (by educators; self-directed learners; specialist advisors whether software architects, lawyers, business strategists, etc.)
- For the educators, emphasize that the resources are optimised for re-use in, say:
- That's to say, the FLOW Syllabus is not a course or a curriculum in and of itself, rather it is a venue for the community to identify the salient topics to be successful in the coordination of free/libre/open works;
- Keep the intro/invite short, link to a more complete statement
- Situate the FLOW Syllabus as one of the results of the direction that the OSI Board has decided to go
Action: Patrick will draft somethinga and circulate for input
2: OSI-EDU-WG Meeting Venu
Discussion about the media of participation, and the Useful Coordination Links section http://osi.xwiki.com/bin/Projects/draft-flow-syllabus#HUsefulCoordinationLinks Some options for the primary meeting venue currently being looked at:
- https://togetherjs.com/
- http://openmeetings.apache.org/
- http://bigbluebutton.org/
- http://www.ekiga.org/
- others?
...Let's continue to assess, but make the decision next week about the primary venue for OSI-EDU-WG weekly meetings.
Some criteria are:
- respect freedom of choice of users
- people in other fields will want other tools they are familiar with
- best if the solution does not requre yet another registration to something (nice example: http://www.openetherpad.org )
- the venue we choose for OSI-EDU-WG will thus be getting an implicit thumbs-up
3: Management of Open Access; Open Learning, as a Topic
Thoughts on a sub-section to the syllabus about the effective management of open learning intiatives, open access journals
- http://wikieducator.org/OERF:About
- http://oeruniversitas.org/terms-of-service
- Governance tagged items at http://www.evolllution.com/category/institutional_governance/
Possibly a sub-section of "Methodologies Inspiring Our Approach"
http://osi.xwiki.com/bin/Projects/draft-flow-syllabus#HMethodologiesInspiringOurApproach
Yes this would be useful, BUT
- stick to FLOW Syllabus scope
- not more than a sub-section
- point to some best sources
- keep in mind that the audience is different than the main FLOW audience
- highlight similarities with free/libre/open, but realize that the starting point for most educators is different
4: Resource-Based Learning
Thoughts on: "Resource-based learning" http://www.reusability.org/read/chapters/hannafin.doc
- Generally there's an inverse relation between reusability and substantive focus
- FLOW Syllabus should point learners to resources, let learners and educators structure "their courses"
- This implies emphasis on primary sources, not on "learning activities". Let users of the syllabus design learning activities.
- Probably best to remove the "education philosophy" content (andragogy, case method, problem method) since this is out of scope for the FLOW Syllabus per se, and yet would attract a lot of debate amongst educators. It's interesting, but provides no specific net benefit for the FLOW Syllabus' explicit objectives.
- Reminder to provide points for each section on "learning outcomes"