Last modified by Stefano Maffulli on 2023/02/17 01:52

<
From version < 6.1 >
edited by Joseph Potvin
on 2014/01/17 13:48
To version < 7.1 >
edited by Joseph Potvin
on 2014/01/17 14:58
>
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -5,8 +5,9 @@
5 5  The purpose of this Working Group is to adapt, develop and disseminate learning resources to help project managers of projects, portfolios, organizations or consortia gain an advanced understanding of strategies, processes and methods for the management, resourcing and governance of Free/Libre/Open Works (FLOW).
6 6  
7 7  These learning resources:
8 +
8 8  * Are concerned with the application of explicit free/libre/open arrangements relating to:
9 -– Software, specifications, diagrams, tables, documentation and any other [[http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/102 copyrightable works];
10 +– Software, specifications, diagrams, tables, documentation and any other [[copyrightable works>>url:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/102||title="copyrightable works"]]
10 10  – Data, ideas and designs that might otherwise be restricted through practices and under laws besides copyright.
11 11  * Are structured upon the pluralist premise that there is intrinsic value in communicating the multiple points of view on issues and topics, taking into account the merging and differentiation of various concepts and motivations through time;
12 12  * Should be useful on their own, and as supplements to other professional and academic learning resources for managers of projects, portfolios, organizations or consortia.
... ... @@ -14,13 +14,10 @@
14 14  – Those who prefer the CC-by-sa v4 can contribute dual-licensed content to the core and to their own instance, or add solely CC-by-sa licensed content to their own instance;
15 15  – Those who prefer the GNU-fdl v2 can contribute dual-licensed content to the core, and to their own instance, or add solely GNU-fdl licensed content to their own instance;
16 16  
18 +Widely used frameworks for project management — such as the [[Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBoK)>>url:http://www.pmi.org/PMBOK-Guide-and-Standards.aspx||rel="__blank" title="Project Management Body of Knowledge"]] and [[Projects in Controlled Environments v2 (PRINCE2)>>url:http://www.prince-officialsite.com/||rel="__blank" title="Projects in Controlled Environments v2 (PRINCE2)"]] learning programs and certifications — do not effectively address open source issues, including ethics, methods, processes, governance, HR management, corporate strategy, law, and financing. These frameworks are currently modelled upon projects under hierarchical management and exclusive organizational terms. These frameworks also assume that all projects are under exclusive organizational terms and hierarchical management. Their governing bodies have even adopted strongly restrictive intellectual rights stances towards how their own [[PMBoK>>url:http://www.pmi.org/professional-development/~~/media/PDF/Professional-Development/PMI%20REPIntellectual%20PropertyTutorial102010.ashx||rel="__blank" title="PMBoK"]] and [[PRINCE2>>url:http://www.axelos.com/Intellectual-Property-Rights/Intellectual-Property-Licensing/||rel="__blank" title="PRINCE2"]] ([[read more>>url:http://www.advantagelearning.co.uk/news/axelos.html||rel="__blank" title="read more"]]) reference materials evolve and are disseminated.
17 17  
18 -Mainstream management education is only superficially engaging with the evolution of successful free/libre/open source software development methodologies. Widely used educational materials — such as the PMP (Project Management Professional) and PRINCE2 (Projects in Controlled Environments, v.2) certifications do not effectively address open source issues, including ethics, methods, processes, governance, HR management, corporate strategy, law, and financing.
20 +The OSI Board charters this Working Group to resolve this gap by extending and refining an existing sharable asset entitled the “Management Education Syllabus on the Methods, Processes, Resourcing and Governance of Free/Libre/Open Works, and by facilitating the development of an open market for service offerings based on it, aligned with the expectations and priorities of OSI and its global network of allied organizations and individuals.
19 19  
20 -OSI would like to charter a working group to address this gap, in order to fulfill its mission by helping educate the public, and management of technology organizations, about the benefits of open source.
21 -
22 -The primary goal of this working group would be to extend and refine an existing project management syllabus according to the requirements and priorities indicated by OSI and associated third parties identified by OSI. The resulting syllabus would help managers and developers improve their licensing, development, and business practices, and may also be useful for educational institutions.
23 -
24 24  == Initial project proposal to OSI by Joseph Potvin, Nov. 7, 2013 ==
25 25  
26 26  === Working Group Participants ===

Submit feedback regarding this wiki to webmaster@opensource.org

This wiki is licensed under a Creative Commons 2.0 license
XWiki 14.10.13 - Documentation