Summary

• Page properties (2 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Title

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-FreeLibreOpenWorksManagementEducation
	1	+Free/Libre/Open Works (FLOW) Management Education

Content

...	...	@@ -1,8 +1,12 @@
	1	+**__Charter of the OSI Working Group on__:**
	2	+
1	1	= Management Education About Free/Libre/Open Works (Methods, Processes and Governance) =
2	2
	5	+//Version 0.2 (Not yet approved by WG Participants, nor ratified by the OSI Board.)//
	6	+
3	3	== Purpose ==
4	4
5		-The purpose of this Working Group is to adapt, develop and disseminate learning resources to help project managers of projects, portfolios, organizations or consortia gain an advanced understanding of strategies, processes and methods for the management, resourcing and governance of Free/Libre/Open Works (FLOW).
	9	+The purpose of this Working Group is to adapt, develop and disseminate modular learning resources to help project managers of projects, portfolios, organizations or consortia gain an advanced understanding of strategies, processes and methods for the management, resourcing and governance of Free/Libre/Open Works (FLOW).
6	6
7	7	These learning resources:
8	8
...	...	@@ -9,15 +9,15 @@
9	9	* Are concerned with the application of explicit free/libre/open arrangements relating to:
10	10	– Software, specifications, diagrams, tables, documentation and any other [[copyrightable works>>url:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/102||title="copyrightable works"]]
11	11	– Data, ideas and designs that might otherwise be restricted through practices and under laws besides copyright.
12		-* Are structured upon the pluralist premise that there is intrinsic value in communicating the multiple points of view on issues and topics, taking into account the merging and differentiation of various concepts and motivations through time;
13		-* Should be useful on their own, and as supplements to other professional and academic learning resources for managers of projects, portfolios, organizations or consortia.
	16	+* Are structured upon the pluralist premise that there is intrinsic value in communicating the multiple points of view on issues and topics, taking into account both the merging and differentiation of various concepts and efforts through time;
	17	+* Should be useful on their own, and as supplementary modules to other professional and academic learning resources for managers of projects, portfolios, organizations or consortia.
14	14	* Are made available under the CC-by-sa v4 and the GNU-fdl v2 licenses to any organization or individual to use, re-brand, adapt, redistribute and independently host:
15		-– Those who prefer the CC-by-sa v4 can contribute dual-licensed content to the core and to their own instance, or add solely CC-by-sa licensed content to their own instance;
16		-– Those who prefer the GNU-fdl v2 can contribute dual-licensed content to the core, and to their own instance, or add solely GNU-fdl licensed content to their own instance;
	19	+– Those who prefer the CC-by-sa v4 can contribute dual-licensed content to the core and to their own derivative works, or add solely CC-by-sa licensed content to their own derivative works;
	20	+– Those who prefer the GNU-fdl v2 can contribute dual-licensed content to the core, and to their own derivative works, or add solely GNU-fdl licensed content to their own derivative works;
17	17
18		-The most widely used frameworks for learning and certification in the project management field — such as the [[Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBoK)>>url:http://www.pmi.org/PMBOK-Guide-and-Standards.aspx||rel="__blank" title="Project Management Body of Knowledge"]] and [[Projects in Controlled Environments v2 (PRINCE2)>>url:http://www.prince-officialsite.com/||rel="__blank" title="Projects in Controlled Environments v2 (PRINCE2)"]] — are currently focused upon projects under hierarchical management, exclusive organizational terms and //"positivist//" perspectives. Their governing bodies have also adopted strongly restrictive intellectual rights stances towards how their own [[PMBoK>>url:http://www.pmi.org/professional-development/~~/media/PDF/Professional-Development/PMI%20REPIntellectual%20PropertyTutorial102010.ashx||rel="__blank" title="PMBoK"]] and [[PRINCE2>>url:http://www.axelos.com/Intellectual-Property-Rights/Intellectual-Property-Licensing/||rel="__blank" title="PRINCE2"]] ([[read more>>url:http://www.advantagelearning.co.uk/news/axelos.html||rel="__blank" title="read more"]]) reference materials evolve and are disseminated. Both in their content and operations, they currently do not accommodate free/libre/open ethics, methods, processes, governance, HR management, strategy, security, law, financing or //"constructivist"// perspectives.
	22	+The most widely used frameworks for learning and certification in the project management field — such as the [[Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBoK)>>url:http://www.pmi.org/PMBOK-Guide-and-Standards.aspx||rel="__blank" title="Project Management Body of Knowledge"]] and [[Projects in Controlled Environments v2 (PRINCE2)>>url:http://www.prince-officialsite.com/||rel="__blank" title="Projects in Controlled Environments v2 (PRINCE2)"]] — are currently focused upon projects and portfolios under hierarchical management, exclusive organizational terms and //"positivist//" perspectives. Their governing bodies have also adopted strongly restrictive intellectual rights stances towards how their own [[PMBoK>>url:http://www.pmi.org/professional-development/~~/media/PDF/Professional-Development/PMI%20REPIntellectual%20PropertyTutorial102010.ashx||rel="__blank" title="PMBoK"]] and [[PRINCE2>>url:http://www.axelos.com/Intellectual-Property-Rights/Intellectual-Property-Licensing/||rel="__blank" title="PRINCE2"]] ([[read more>>url:http://www.advantagelearning.co.uk/news/axelos.html||rel="__blank" title="read more"]]) reference materials evolve and are disseminated. Both in their content and operations, currently they do not accommodate free/libre/open ethics, methods, processes, governance, HR management, strategy, security, law, financing or //"constructivist"// perspectives.
19	19
20		-The OSI Board charters this Working Group to resolve this gap by extending and refining an existing sharable asset entitled the “Management Education Syllabus on the Methods, Processes, Resourcing and Governance of Free/Libre/Open Works”, and by facilitating the development of a global open market for service offerings based upon it, which meets the expectations and priorities of OSI supporters, and a global network of like-minded organizations and individuals.
	24	+The OSI Board charters this Working Group to resolve this gap by extending and refining an existing sharable asset entitled the “Management Education Syllabus on the Methods, Processes, Resourcing and Governance of Free/Libre/Open Works”, and by facilitating the development of a global open market for service offerings based upon it, which meets the expectations and priorities of OSI supporters, and a global network of generally like-minded organizations and individuals.
21	21
22	22	== Initial project proposal to OSI by Joseph Potvin, Nov. 7, 2013 ==
23	23