Summary

• Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Content

...	...	@@ -21,138 +21,36 @@
21	21	**__Session:__**
22	22	{{include reference="Projects.Primary Currents that Create and Maintain FLOW"/}}
23	23
24		-(((
25		-
26		-(((
27	27	----
28	28
29	29	**__Session:__**
30	30	{{include reference="Projects.A Panoply of Intellectual Capital Restrictions"/}}
31	31
32		-(((
33		-
34		-(((
35	35	----
36	36
37	37	**__Session:__**
38	38	{{include reference="Projects.Copyright Risk & Value Management"/}}
39	39
40		-(((
41		-
42		-(((
43	43	----
44	44
45	45	**__Session:__**
46	46	{{include reference="Artificial Monopolies on Computational Ideas"/}}
47	47
48		-(((
49		-
50		-(((
51	51	----
52	52
53	53	**__Session:__**
54	54	{{include reference="FLOW Licensing and Contracting"/}}
55	55
56		-(((
57		-
58		-(((
59	59	----
60	60
61		-= [[Session: FLOW Foundations and Their Ways]] =
	46	+[[FLOW Foundations and Their Ways]]
62	62
63		-== The Free/Libre/Open Way Part 1: FLOW Governance Concepts ==
64	64
65		-* Governance of Not-for-Profit Organizations
66		-** 20 Questions Directors of Not-for-profit Organizations Should Ask about Governance http://www.cica.ca/focus-on-practice-areas/governance-strategy-and-risk/not-for-profit-director-series/20-questions-series/item12302.pdf
67		-** To Pay or Not To Pay http://asspl.com.au/article/to-pay-or-not-to-pay/
68		-* Governance of Open Source Software Foundations
69		-** A Framework for Evaluating Managerial Styles in Open Source Projects http://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/framework%20for%20evaluating%20Mangerial%20Style.pdf
70		-** Governance of Open Source Software Foundations: Who Holds the Power? (See p 41 "Centres of power for all six foundations" and p 42 "Conclusion") http://timreview.ca/sites/default/files/article_PDF/Prattico_TIMReview_December2012.pdf
71		-** Open Source Software Foundations (See "OSSF Effectiveness") http://timreview.ca/article/194
72		-** Tragedy of the FOSS Commons? Investigating the institutional designs of free/libre and open source software projects http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1619/1534
	49	+**__Session:__**
	50	+{{include reference="FLOW Foundations and Their Ways"/}}
73	73
74		-=== Real World Contract Court Cases (what went wrong; reasons for decision) ===
	52	+----
75	75
76		-* Case 1: See Paragraphs 37-42 in: Wayne John Stewart v. Her Majesty The Queen (R. v. Stewart, [1988] 1 S.C.R. 963) http://scc.lexum.org/decisia-scc-csc/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/331/1/document.do
77		-
78		-* Case 2: United States of America v. Sergey Aleynikov http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/ea08355b-8152-43de-ad6f-7299ed2f176f/1/doc/11-1126_complete_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/ea08355b-8152-43de-ad6f-7299ed2f176f/1/hilite/
79		-** Question in Goldman Sachs case: Can open-source software be stolen? http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9137161/Question_in_Goldman_Sachs_case_Can_open_source_software_be_stolen_
80		-** Unlawful use of secret scientific material and unlawful duplication of computer related material http://blogs.findlaw.com/in_house/2013/05/vance-can-proceed-to-trial-against-former-goldman-sachs-programmer.html
81		-** [[Trade Secrets]]
82		-** Behavioural Risk Indicators of Malicious Insider Theft of Intellectual Property
83		-http://www.symantec.com/about/news/release/article.jsp?prid=20111207_01
84		-
85		-☏ __Audio File (pending):__ Listen to a Discussion with an Invited Authority on Intellectual Rights Compliance Management and Risk Identification
86		-
87		-* Janet Campbell, Director, Intellectual Property, Secretary and Legal Counsel, Eclipse Foundation. Janet is responsible for the review of intellectual property proposed for inclusion in Eclipse open source projects. This review includes examining both the provenance of the intellectual property and license compatibility. She is author of the Eclipse Legal Process and maintains the document on an ongoing basis. She is also co-author of the Eclipse Guide to Legal Documents, which has benefitted from the work of several contributors over the years. In this session, Janet will discuss how the Eclipse Foundation manages contributions of source code to Eclipse projects and undertakes due diligence to reduce and mitigate risks due to parties involved in re-use or re-distribution. http://www.microdoc.com/eclipse-embedded-day-2009-video-managing-open-source-legal-issues-janet-campbell
88		-
89		-=== Software License Risk-Minimization and Value-Maximization in the Organization's Context ===
90		-
91		-* Current Practices
92		-* Concerns and Challenges
93		-* Interests and Opportunities
94		-
95		-== The Free/Libre/Open Way Part 2: Multi-Entity Team and Organizational Performance ==
96		-
97		-* Concepts, definitions, boundary of application, measurement, feedback
98		-* Multi-Organizational Teams
99		-** Risky Trust: How Multi-entity Teams Develop Trust in a High Risk Endeavor http://www.hbs.edu/research/pdf/11-089.pdf
100		-** Team Scaffolds: How Minimal Team Structures Enable Role-Based Coordination http://www.hbs.edu/research/pdf/12-062.pdf
101		-
102		-☏ __Audio File (pending):__ Listen to a Discussion with an Invited Authority on Contract Considerations that Affect Participation in Free/Libre/Open Works
103		-
104		-* Amanda Brock is Director at the international technology law firm, Origin, www.origin.co.uk. Prior to joining Origin, she was General Counsel of Canonical for 5 years. She has an LLB (Hons) from the University of Glasgow, a Masters of Comparative Jurisprudence from New York University and an LLM in IP and IT law from Queen Mary, University of London. She is admitted as a solicitor in Scotland and England and Wales. She is author of "E:Business; The Practical Guide to the Laws", and was an editor of the Butterworth's publication Electronic Business Law, and contributed a chapter on commercial agreements in open source to Walden and Shentov, Free and Open Source Software: Policy, Law and Practise, published by Oxford University Press in 2013. Amanda has lectured extensively on IT and commercial law internationally. http://www.origin.co.uk/team/amanda-brock.php
105		-
106		-== The Free/Libre/Open Way Part 3: Case Analysis ==
107		-
108		-— How does someone become a participant in their projects?
109		-— How are decisions arrived at?
110		-— Does the license type seem to influence any aspect of governance?
111		-— How does each address copyright ownership?
112		-— How does each address patent non-aggression?
113		-— What //unwritten expectations// should you keep in mind?
114		-
115		-* Linux Foundation http://www.linuxfoundation.org/about/bylaws
116		-— A Guide to the Kernel Development Process https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/development-process/1.Intro
117		-— Open Source Compliance Publications http://www.linuxfoundation.org/publications/compliance
118		-
119		-* OpenStack Foundation https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Foundation/Bylaws
120		-— Contribute to OpenStack / Community https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Main_Page
121		-— http://www.openstack.org/legal/
122		-
123		-* Eclipse Foundation http://www.eclipse.org/org/documents/
124		-— Eclipse Development Process http://www.eclipse.org/projects/dev_process/development_process_2011.php
125		-
126		-* Apache Foundation http://www.apache.org/foundation/
127		-— Open Source Software Peer Review Practices: A Case Study of the Apache Server http://faculty.salisbury.edu/~xswang/research/papers/serelated/testing/p541-rigby.pdf
128		-
129		-* LLVM (not a foundation but still interesting for us)
130		-— LLVM Developer Policy http://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html
131		-— Life of an Instruction in LLVM http://eli.thegreenplace.net/2012/11/24/life-of-an-instruction-in-llvm/
132		-
133		-* R Foundation http://www.r-project.org/foundation/Rfoundation-statutes.pdf
134		-— [[Model of Rigorous FLOW Control at CRAN]] (Comprehensive R Archive Network)
135		-
136		-* GNOME Foundation http://www.gnome.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/bylaws.pdf
137		-
138		-* Open Cloud Principles http://www.opencloudinitiative.org/principles
139		-
140		-* OpenDaylight http://www.opendaylight.org/resources/faq#3m
141		-— http://www.networkworld.com/news/2013/041913-ibm-opendaylight-268912.html
142		-
143		-* OpenFlow http://www.openflow.org/wp/openflow-components/
144		-— Why Apache is important to Openflow http://www.projectfloodlight.org/blog/2012/01/30/why-apache-is-important-to-openflow/
145		-
146		-Preparation for the Session: __Audio File (pending):__ Listen to a Discussion with an Invited Authority on "Best Practices in Organizing and running a FOSS Foundation")
147		-
148		-* Mark Radcliffe is a senior partner at DLA Piper who practices corporate securities and intellectual property law. He has worked with many software companies, in particular open source companies and is Chair of the Open Source Industry Group at the firm. He assisted Sun Microsystems in open sourcing the Solaris operating system and drafting the "Common Development and Distribution License" (CDDL). He has represented eBay, Accenture, Adobe, Palm, Sony, Siemens Venture Capital, and SugarCRM (the first venture backed open source applications company). On a pro bono basis, he serves as outside General Counsel for the Open Source Initiative and on the Legal Committee of the Apache Software Foundation. He was the Chair of Committee C for the Free Software Foundation in reviewing GPLv3 and was the lead drafter for Project Harmony. In 2012, he became outside general counsel of the Open Stack Foundation. http://www.openstack.org/foundation/staff
149		-
150		-=== Review, Integration, Operational Implications ===
151		-
152		-* The next two weeks
153		-* The next two months
154		-* The next two years
155		-
156	156	== Resources ==
157	157
158	158	Validos: The Validos initiative helps businesses engage with Free Software. The primary focus of Validos is package level compliance and clear reporting to facilitate simple redistribution of code. With its format of cooperative information sharing among corporate and legal stakeholders, Validos provides a way to increase compliance fidelity and streamline code management activities. It is a Finnish registered association with thirteen members, and has a modest annual fee for participation. Website: http://www.validos.org